The New York Times | Opinion: What the Cult of Efficiency Costs Us

Reposted from: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/14/opinion/chris-murphy-save-bacon-pigs.html

June 14, 2026

Chris Murphy, the Democratic senator from Connecticut, offered the graduates of Wesleyan University wise counsel in his commencement speech a few weeks back. “You are about to step out into a world that prizes efficiency and the annihilation of drift and friction above all else,” he said. “Our entire economy is built on rewarding companies that are efficient at making a profit, not based upon how they treat their workers, the social value of their product or the impact they have on the community.”

“You didn’t design this world,” he continued. “You didn’t choose it. But you will live with the consequences of this cult of efficiency. And you will have to choose which side you are on.”

How do you make the most bread from the least wheat? A classic question of efficiency, but one that can be answered destructively. You can mix the flour with chalk or gypsum, as bakers sometimes did in previous centuries. Weigh the bread, and “more” of it is being made. But then people are eating powdered rock. Or you can use alum to whiten your loaves on the cheap. But alum harms the human digestive system and can kill children who consume it, as happened during the Victorian era.

This leads to a question that we too rarely ask: Efficient for whom? In Victorian England, what could be efficient for the baker was ruinous for the buyer. In modern America, what can be efficient for the factory farmer can be ruinous for the animal and, I’d argue, unwise for us.

In April, the House passed its version of the farm bill. It’s one of those sprawling pieces of legislation that includes many sections sizable enough to be their own bills. One of those sections is the text of a bill that would not stand a chance in the Senate on its own: the Save Our Bacon Act.

Read the rest of the article on The New York Times’ website.

Ezra Klein